Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Berman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 2002No. 6 and 7 EAP 2001PublishedCited by 40 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

Chief Justice ZAPPALA.

This case requires application of the coordinate jurisdiction rule and an examination of circumstances when the rule does not apply. We must decide whether the trial court violated the rule.

Appellant, Barbara Ann Marie Ryan, instituted a medical malpractice action in 1985 against Doctors Cattolico and DiTommaso, her family doctors, and against Doctors Berman, Rossman, and Jaffe, consulting specialists, alleging negligent failure to diagnose Cushing’s Syndrome, a rare adrenal disorder that results in elevated levels of the hormone cortisol. This had allegedly…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. StarrSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  3. Salerno v. Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Goldey v. Trustees of the University of PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

3Cited by40 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. ChmielSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  2. Maloney v. VALLEY MEDICAL FACILITIES, INC.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  3. Wood v. EI Du Pont De Nemours and Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  4. Com. v. Maxwell, E.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2020
  5. Gerrow v. John Royle & SonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2002

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API