Legal Opinion

State v. DeYoung

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided December 9, 2003No. C6-02-2280PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KLAPHAKE, Judge.

In this appeal from a conviction for first-degree criminal damage to property, appellant argues: (1) the district court abused its discretion by denying his motion to modify the standard Spreigl jury instruction to specify that evidence of two prior incidents in which he damaged property was admitted only to prove identity and motive; and (2) when the victim testified that she had paid exactly $500 for replacement parts to repair the damaged property and performed the labor herself, there was insufficient evidence to prove that the cost of repair and replacement…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. WebbSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Alholm v. WiltSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State v. FloresSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  5. State v. ColeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  2. State v. MeldrumCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2006
  3. State v. BabcockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API