Legal Opinion
La Michoacana Plus Ice Cream Parlor Corp v. Windy City Paletas
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 4, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00631Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LA MICHOACANA PLUS ICE CREAM Case No.: 24-cv-00631-H-MMP 12 PARLOR CORP, a California 13 corporation, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ PARTIAL MOTION TO DISMISS 14 Plaintiff, WITH LEAVE TO AMEND 15 v. [Doc. No. 32.] 16 WINDY CITY PALETAS, INC., a California corporation; ECUAMEX 17 PALETAS, INC., a California 18 corporation; SKY LIMIT ENTERPRISES II, INC., a Nevada corporation; KJAM 19 PALETAS, INC., a California 20 corporation; ARTURO MIRANDA, an individual; KAYLA RINCON, an 21 individual; DIGMEY JARAMILLO, an 22…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Navarro v. BlockCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.