Legal Opinion

Walker v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 15, 1923No. 14396PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

Only the 2d headnote needs elaboration. In the original motion for a new trial in this case it is urged that “the venue and jurisdiction was not proved.” We cannot agree *276with this contention. A witness, after having testified that the defendant shot and killed the deceased, added: “ This was in Mora, in Coffee County.” This evidence alone was sufficient to prove the venue. In Mitchum v. State, 11 Ga. 619 (1), Judge Nisbet, who delivered the opinion, said: “ And first, it is claimed that the presiding judge erred in refusing a new trial upon the ground that it was not proven that the crime…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  2. Moye v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  3. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  4. Wade v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
  5. Wright v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Georgia · 1872

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cade v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2011
  2. Gibson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  3. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1939
  4. Davis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1941
  5. Dennis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API