Legal Opinion

Davis v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 25, 1941No. 29294PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGardner, J.

1. While proof “that an offense was committed in a designated municipality is not in itself sufficient to show venue in any particular county of this State” (Casper v. State, 43 Ga. App. 152, 157 S. E. 883; Moye v. State, 65 Ga. 754; Cooper v. State, 106 Ga. 119 (2), 32 S. E. 23; Wooten v. State, 119 Ga. 745, 47 S. E. 193; Murphy v. State, 121 Ga. 142, 48 S. E. 909; Smith v. State, 2 Ga. App. 413, 58 S. E. 549; S tringfield v. State, 4 Ga. App. 842, 62 S. E. 569; Walker v. State, 30 Ga. App. 275, 277, 117 S. E. 822), yet where the witness testified, during the trial of the defendant on a…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1852
  2. Cooper v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
  3. Dickerson v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  4. Moye v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1880
  5. Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Harmon v. HarmonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1953
  2. Hubbard v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1951
  3. Williams v. Department of Human ResourcesCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1979
  4. Witcher v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API