Legal Opinion

Deaver v. . Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1894PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Upon the return of a verdict by the jury the plaintiff proposed to the defendant that the verdict should be set aside by consent of the parties, and the court, upon such consent, made an order setting the verdict aside and granting a new trial.

On the day following, the plaintiff moved the court to set aside the order setting aside the verdict, and for judgment according to the verdict.

The defendant resisted the motion, but the court made an order reinstating the verdict, and defendant excepted and appealed. Where an order or judgment is made by consent it cannot be vacated or modified even at…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fowler v. . PoorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  2. McEachern v. . KerchnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  3. A. H. Stump & Sons v. LongSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Vaughan Barnes v. . Gooch and PrescottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  5. Smith v. . FortSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Public Service Elec. and Gas Co. v. WaldroupNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  2. In Re Estate of MeredithMichigan Supreme Court · 1936
  3. Karnes v. BlackCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  4. Hodges v. . StewartSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. TenenbaumSupreme Court of Virginia · 1923

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API