Bardach Iron & Steel Co. v. Tenenbaum
Supreme Court of Virginia
1Opinion of the CourtBurks, J.
This is a proceeding by motion to recover damages, presumably for the failure of the defendant to accept and pay for goods purchased of the plaintiff. We say presumably, because the notice does not so state, though the evidence tends to sustain a claim of that nature. The action was commenced in the name of the Chatham Iron and Metal Company, Inc., but pending the proceeding, S. Tenenbaum, the defendant in error, was substituted as plaintiff. The notice was as follows:
“To Bardach Iron and Steel Company, Inc., a corporation:
“Take notice that the undersigned, Chatham Iron and Metal Company,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United States v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Robertson's v. Atlantic Coast Realty Co.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Matthews v. LaPradeSupreme Court of Virginia · 1921
- Myers v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia · 1922
- Simmons v. YohoWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1923
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Ford v. FordSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Virginia Concrete Co. v. Board of SupervisorsSupreme Court of Virginia · 1956
- Chesapeake House on the Bay, Inc. v. Virginia National BankSupreme Court of Virginia · 1986
- Wells v. Lorcom House Condominiums' Council of Co-OwnersSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
- Harmon v. SadjadiSupreme Court of Virginia · 2007
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.