Legal Opinion

United States v. Triandaplous

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 15, 1937No. 8100Published

1Opinion of the Court

NETERER, District Judge.

To reverse a judgment on war risk insurance policy for total and permanent disability, this appeal is prosecuted.

Errors relied upon are: (a) Trial court erred in denying motion for a directed verdict; (b) error in admitting opinion evidence of doctors as to total and permanent disability.

This case is on all fours with the suit of U. S. v. Eide, etc. (C.C.A.) 88 F.(2d) 682, decided February 23, 1937. Appellee was wounded in the Battle of the Argonne, France, October 10, 1918. He received a gunshot wound six or more inches long on the interior surface of the left thigh…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Wood v. WeimarSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. United States v. EideCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API