Legal Opinion

United States v. Eide

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 23, 1937No. 8178PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HANEY, Circuit Judge.

In an action to recover on a war risk insurance policy, the jury returned a verdict for appellee, and from the judgment entered in accordance therewith, the government appeals.'

The soldier contracted influenza while in the army, and appellee seeks recovery on the ground that the soldier contracted a neuropsychiatric disease as a result of the influenza, which rendered him totally and permanently disabled.

Appellee called Dr. Edwin M. Wilder as a witness, who was given the departmental definition of total and permanent disability, and was then asked: “Bearing in mind that…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. United States v. SpauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  3. United States v. StephensCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1934
  4. Du Vall v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  5. United States v. WhiteCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1935

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Gros v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  2. Nulex, Inc. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1958
  3. United States v. PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Gros v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1943
  5. United States v. TriandaplousCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API