Legal Opinion
Simon v. Wiessmann
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided December 5, 2008No. 07-3880UnpublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED OPINION OF THE COURT
MICHEL, Chief Circuit Judge.
Richard D. Simon, Vera Pomerantz, Ronald J. Smolow, and others of the putative class (collectively “Simon”) are claimants of previously unclaimed property taken into the custody of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, pursuant to the Disposition of Abandoned and Unclaimed Proper ty Act (“DAUPA”), codified at 72 P.S. § 1301.1 et seq. We must determine whether certain DAUPA provisions, relieving the State from having to pay interest earned on unclaimed property, impose a taking for which just compensation must be paid, pursuant to the Fifth…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Chicago, Burlington & Quincy Railroad v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Webb's Fabulous Pharmacies, Inc. v. BeckwithSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Oscanyan v. Arms Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1881
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- American Express Travel Related Services Co. v. Sidamon-EristoffDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2011
- Hall v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018
- Temple-Inland, Inc. v. CookDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2015
- DILLOW v. GARRITYDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- JUST v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONSDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.