Legal Opinion

People v. Maioli

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 7, 1933No. Docket No. 1283PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPullen, P. J.

Against defendant an information was filed charging forgery. He was tried and convicted and now appeals from the judgment and the order denying the motion for a new trial.

Defendant issued a check signed “Haioli Bros”, payable to Hector Haioli and indorsed by Hector Haioli. This check was drawn on the Commercial Bank of Patterson and at that time there was an account therein in the name of Haioli Bros. Defendant presented this check to a merchant and received in return merchandise and the balance in cash.

It is urged by appellant upon this appeal that where the offense is forgery of the name of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. WhitemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. People v. LundinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1897
  3. People v. HidalgoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. Hood BrownCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
  2. People v. StoddardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1948
  3. Owen v. PeopleSupreme Court of Colorado · 1948
  4. People v. CullenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. Charles A. Ryno v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1956

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API