Legal Opinion

In re Ringstad

District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Decided March 3, 1930No. 81899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SCHOONMAKER, District Judge.

Objection is made to the naturalization of Erling Ringstad because it is alleged that his absence from the United States after he filed his petition for naturalization, from November 3, 1928, to December 18,1929, broke tbe continuity of his residence in the United States.

The question at issue is the application to tho present case of the requirements of section 6(b) of tbe Act of Congress of March 2, 1929, title 8, section 382, USCA, which are as follows:

Section 6(b) Fourth, (2); “Absence from the United States for a continuous period of one year or more during the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Neuberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. United States v. DickDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1923
  3. In re SchneiderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  4. Hantzopoulos v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1927
  5. In re PiastroDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re HildenDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1945
  2. In re TurnerDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1931

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API