Legal Opinion
Neuberger v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided July 13, 1926No. 101PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHand, Circuit Judge
(after stating the facts as above). That Neuberger’s domicile remained in New York there is not the slightest question. On the record, his detention until December, 1918, was involuntary, and while the explanation of his subsequent delay of over two years before returning might prove inadequate upon cross-examination, or upon a trial under a bill to eaneel, we shall accept it for the purposes of this appeal. Indeed, even if he voluntarily lingered for a part of that time, it would not have lost him his domicile. New York was his adopted home, and he clearly never meant to abandon it. But…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. MulveyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1916
- Grant v. DalliberSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1836
- Stadtmuller v. MillerCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
- United States v. CantiniCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1914
- Millett v. PearsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1919
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- McGrath v. KristensenSupreme Court of the United States · 1950
- Meyer Harris Cohen, AKA Michael 'Mickey' Cohen v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
- Orville E. Stifel, II v. William F. Hopkins, Esq.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1973
- Seeley v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue. Seeley v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- James G. Ellingburg v. L. M. Connett, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution Records Office OfficialsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.