Legal Opinion

In re Hilden

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 23, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIFKIND, District Judge.

The petitioner has for more than one year, during the five year period immediately preceding the filing of his petition for naturalization, been absent from the United States. His departure was voluntary but the prolongation of his absence was involuntary. He never abandoned his “residence” in the United States. Is he qualified to be admitted to citizenship? The precise question has never been passed upon under the statute now in effect. 8 U.S.C.A. § 707. Does involuntary absence from the United States constitute absence within the meaning of the stat*846ute which…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Neuberger v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1926
  2. In re SchneiderDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1927
  3. In re SchradieckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1928
  4. In re ConisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929
  5. Hantzopoulos v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1927

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. In Re Petition for Naturalization of LaVoieDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1972
  2. United States v. LarsenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
  3. In re YarinaDistrict Court, N.D. Ohio · 1947
  4. In re Naturalization of Vafaei-MakhsoosDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1984
  5. In re Naturalization of HolzerDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API