Bush v. Keaton
Supreme Court of Georgia
The certificate of the presiding judge was not dated at all. The acknowledgement of service was as follows: '• Due and legal service of the within bill of exceptions acknowledged. Copy and all further service waived. This November 4th, 1879. (Signed) B. B. Bower, “ Att'y for J.K. P. Keaton, ex'r of B. 0. Keaton, deft in error."
1Opinion of the Court
1, The service of the bill of exceptions must affirmatively appear to have been made after the certificate of the presiding judge was attached thereto. (R.)
2. The certificate of the judge must affirmatively appear to have been attached to the bill of exceptions within thirty days from the adjournment of the term of the court at which the trial was had, or some reason therefor be given in the certificate showing that such delay was without fault of the complaining party. (R.)
Bill of exceptions. Practice in the Supreme Court. February Term, 1880.
When this case was called counsel for defendant…
2Cited by10 opinions
- Evans v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Bailey & Carney Buggy Co. v. GuthrieCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1907
- Porter v. HolmesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1905
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Parrish v. Central of Georgia Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.