Legal Opinion

In re Estate of Davis

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 6, 1996No. 1996-0991PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

[This opinion has been published in Ohio Official Reports at 77 Ohio St.3d 45.] IN RE ESTATE OF SAMUEL DAVIS, SR., A.K.A. SAMUEL DAVIS. [Cite as In re Estate of Davis,

1996-Ohio-347.] Mandamus action challenging probate court orders—Court of appeals does not err in dismissing mandamus action when plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law exists. (No. 96-991—Submitted September 10, 1996—Decided November 6, 1996.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 15658. __________________ {¶ 1} In May 1996, appellant, Louis Davis, filed a complaint in the Court of Appeals…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State ex rel. Cartmell v. DorrianOhio Supreme Court · 1984
  3. State ex rel. Schneider v. Board of Education of North Olmsted City School DistrictOhio Supreme Court · 1992
  4. State ex rel. Hunter v. Certain Judges of Akron Municipal CourtOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  5. In re Estate of DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Wright v. Madison Cty. Mun. CourtOhio Supreme Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API