Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Hunter v. Certain Judges of Akron Municipal Court

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1994No. 93-783PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The action in mandamus and prohibition is dismissed because relator has an adequate remedy at law.

Moyer, C.J., A.W. Sweeney, Wright, Resnick and F.E. Sweeney, JJ., concur. Douglas and Pfeifer, JJ., separately dissent.

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Dannaher v. CrawfordOhio Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State ex rel. Newton v. Court of ClaimsOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State ex rel. Lyons v. ZaleskiOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  4. In re Estate of DavisOhio Supreme Court · 1996
  5. State ex rel. Hunter v. PattersonOhio Supreme Court · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API