Legal Opinion

State, for Use of Altorfer Bros. Co. v. Dalrymple

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided February 4, 1949No. 34,821PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

Appeal by a surety company defendant from an order overruling its separate demurrer to the complaint in an action against a public warehouseman and his surety for the recovery of $8,977.50 alleged to be due as a balance on C.O.D. shipments made in behalf of plaintiff by the warehouseman from plaintiff’s property held in storage.

The complaint alleges that the Altorfer Bros. Company (hereinafter called the plaintiff), for whose use and benefit the action herein is brought, is a manufacturer and seller of washing machines and ironers. The defendant G-. W. Dalrymple (hereinafter…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Commercial National Bank v. Canal-Louisiana Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1916
  2. Ackley v. KelloggNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. Republic Underwriters v. Tillamook Bay Fish Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1939
  4. Brown v. DenisonNew York Supreme Court · 1829
  5. State Ex Rel. Cawrse v. American Surety Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Aetna Insurance Company v. Junction Warehouse CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1968
  2. St. Paul Insurance Companies v. Fireman's Fund American Insurance CompaniesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  3. Loewer v. DuplechinLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  5. Stiftel v. MalarkeySupreme Court of Delaware · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API