Stiftel v. Malarkey
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Dissent
QUILLEN, Justice Ad Litem,
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. I would be less than candid if I did not admit that the decision reached by the majority is technically defensible on a narrow view of the issues presented by the record in this case. But nonetheless I find the decision is wrong and therefore I am compelled to express with regret a contrary conclusion. In my judgment, the majority has reached for a result which is contrary to the better legal construction on the narrow issues presented and, perhaps more importantly, because of the broader issues of…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. KrongoldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
- State ex rel. Biggs v. CorleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1934
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.