Legal Opinion · Dissent

Stiftel v. Malarkey

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided December 28, 1977Published

1Dissent

QUILLEN, Justice Ad Litem,

dissenting:

I respectfully dissent from the opinion of the majority. I would be less than candid if I did not admit that the decision reached by the majority is technically defensible on a narrow view of the issues presented by the record in this case. But nonetheless I find the decision is wrong and therefore I am compelled to express with regret a contrary conclusion. In my judgment, the majority has reached for a result which is contrary to the better legal construction on the narrow issues presented and, perhaps more importantly, because of the broader issues of…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Fox v. Standard Oil Co. of NJSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
  2. Singer v. Magnavox Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1977
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. KrongoldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Delaware · 1952
  5. State ex rel. Biggs v. CorleySupreme Court of Delaware · 1934

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API