Legal Opinion

Cooper v. Mulder

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 12, 1889PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Assumpsit. Plaintiffs bring error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This is an action of assumpsit. On the trial in the circuit court verdict and judgment passed for the defendant. Plaintiffs bring error. On the trial it appeared that plaintiffs were copartners, doing business under the firm name of H. H. Cooper & Co., at Etica, N. Y. During the whole of the year 1887 one T. Traver Was their traveling salesman in Michigan. On August 15, 1887, plaintiffs received from Traver two orders for goods to be shipped to defendant at Fremont, Newaygo county, this State, the first, amounting to 8137.50, to be dated November 1, 1887, and sold on four months’ time, and…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. People v. RichMichigan Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Cudahy Bros. v. West Michigan Dock & Market Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Robinson v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Grinnell v. AndersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API