Robinson v. Mulder
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion, and in 74 Mich. 374. contended for the doctrine stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.
This was an action brought in assumpsit in the Newaygo circuit court for a balance due on merchandise alleged to have been sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant. The claim of plaintiffs shows that the assumed liability of defendant rests upon a similar state of facts as in Cooper v. Mulder, 74 Mich. 374. The plaintiffs had verdict and judgment.
The first error assigned is that the court erred in not sustaining a challenge to the array of jurors. It seems that, at the same term of court, the case of Cooper v. Mulder came on for a new trial under the order of this Court. The…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- People v. WhiteMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Cooper v. MulderMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
3Cited by7 opinions
- Dotterer v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
- Smaltz v. BoyceMichigan Supreme Court · 1896
- State v. O'CONNORSupreme Court of Vermont · 1952
- Walker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1906
- Jones v. WebbSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.