Legal Opinion

Schneider v. United States

District Court, D. Nebraska

Decided July 21, 2000No. Nos. 8:99CV0315, 4:99CV3056, 4:99CV3154, 4:99CV3153PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

STROM, Senior District Judge.

This matter is before the Court on the report and recommendation of the magistrate judge (Filing No. 65 in 8:99CV0315; Filing No. 64 in 4:99CV3056; Filing No. 16 in 4:99CV3153; Filing No. 42 in 4:99CV3154), in which he ordered that all four of the above referenced cases be consolidated, plaintiff William Schneider and Rails to Trails Conservancy (“RTC”) be allowed to intervene into the Seger and Gray cases as plaintiff and defendant respectively. The magistrate judge also recommended that the motion for certification for a national class made…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. American Pipe & Construction Co. v. UtahSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Phillips Petroleum Co. v. ShuttsSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Eastern Enterprises v. ApfelSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
  4. Mausolf v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
  5. Rose Mary Roth BOYD Et Al., Appellants, v. OZARK AIR LINES, INC., AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Bywaters v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Texas · 2000
  2. Johnson v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2001
  3. Maas v. the Penn Central Corporation, 2006-T-0067 (4-30-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  4. Center for Individual Freedom, Inc. v. IrelandDistrict Court, S.D. West Virginia · 2009
  5. Evans v. American Credit Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2004

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API