Legal Opinion

In re Jones

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1912PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Proceedings under section 475 of the Judiciary Law to determine and enforce a lien of petitioner assignor.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackmar, J.

This is a proceeding under section 475 • of the Judiciary Law, formerly section 66,of the Code of Civil Procedure, to determine and enforce a lien of petitioners assignor, W. Martin Jones, deceased, as attorney for the appellant in. the case of Sandiford v. Town of Hempstead. . The petitioner alleges an employment to prosecute an appeal after final judgment, which appeal led to an *332affirmance of the judgment both in the Appellate Division and in the Court of Appeals. 97 App. Div. 163; 186 N. Y. 554.

¡Numerous questions have been raised by counsel, some of law and some of fact; but I have…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. West v. BaconAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1897
  3. Skinner v. BusseNew York Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Sandiford v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  5. Cohn v. PolsteinNew York Supreme Court · 1903

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. In re HughesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1919

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API