Sandiford v. Town of Hempstead
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal by the plaintiff, Eichard Sandiford, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants Frost, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of.
Read the full summary
Appeal by the plaintiff, Eichard Sandiford, from so much of an interlocutory judgment of the Supreme Court in favor of the plaintiff and the defendants Frost, entered in the office of the clerk of the county of. Queens on the 8th day of December, 1902, upon the report of a referee as adjudges that all of the property described in the complaint, except that particularly described in the first part of said, judgment, in the words beginning with “All the right, title and interest of Newbold Lawrence at the time of his death of, in and to the meadow and marsh land, islands and land under water in…
1Opinion of the Court
The following is the opinion of the referee :
Charles F. Brown, Beferee :
The plaintiff and the defendant Carman Frost claim to be the owners of what is practically all of Hempstead bay from the .Oyster bay line to a line about 7,000 feet east of the western boundary line of the town of Hempstead.
They also claim to own a tract of land of the same character known _ as Post Lead, which is located in Hempstead bay between the west boundary line of the town and the west boundary line of the first-mentioned tract.
The plaintiff’s interest in the premises is an undivided one-third which he acquired by…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Corwithe v. GriffingNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Lawrence v. . Town of HempsteadNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- McDermot v. Brooklyn City RailroadNew York Supreme Court · 1894
3Cited by3 opinions
- Murphy v. HirschmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- In re JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1912
- Hannah v. Baylon Holding Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970