Legal Opinion

Cohn v. Polstein

New York Supreme Court

Decided October 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Memoir by the plaintiff’s attorney for leave to continue an action of partition to final judgment to enforce his lien for services and for further relief.'

1Opinion of the CourtClarke, J.

Motion is made by the plaintiff’s attorney for leave to continue this action in partition to final judgment for the purpose of enforcing his lien for services, and for such other and further relief as to the court may seem proper. The plaintiff’s attorney claims that the measure of compensation agreed upon was to be whatever costs and allowances might be awarded in the action. This agreement is not specifically denied by the plaintiff, who, however, states that he has not been able to agree with his attorney upon the sum due for services. The action was commenced for the partition of two…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Fischer-Hansen v. . Bklyn. Heights R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1903
  2. Matter of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
  3. Lee v. Vacuum Oil Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1891
  4. Poole v. . BelchaNew York Court of Appeals · 1892
  5. Bevins v. AlbroNew York Supreme Court · 1895

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Witmark v. PerleyAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API