State v. Valverde
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BALES, Justice.
¶ 1 The trial court, without objection, failed to instruct the jury that the defendant, rather than the State, had the burden of proof on self-defense under the applicable law. Because the defendant has not shown prejudice from the omitted instruction, it is not fundamental error.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 Jesus Valverde, Jr. was charged with aggravated assault. At trial, he admitted committing the assault on April 19, 2006, but claimed he had acted in self-defense. The applicable statute provided that “a defendant shall prove any affirmative defense raised by a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
- State v. BibleArizona Supreme Court · 1993
- State v. RingArizona Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. HunterArizona Supreme Court · 1984
- United States v. WarnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by74 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Johnathan Ian BurnsArizona Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. JamesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State v. PayneCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
- State of Arizona v. William Craig MillerArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Edward James RoseArizona Supreme Court · 2013
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.