Legal Opinion

Bruno v. Borough of Shrewsbury

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided March 28, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The above entitled action was originally brought by the plaintiffs against the defendant through a procedure in lieu of prerogative writs (R.S. 2:80-5 and Superior Court Rule 3:81), to review the "Revised Zoning Ordinance of the Borough of Shrewsbury, New Jersey." The plaintiffs in their suit demanded, (1) that the said ordinance be set aside in its entirety, and (2) that such provisions of said ordinance as violate the statutes of the State of New Jersey and Constitution of the United States be set aside. The merits of the original cause of action on behalf of the plaintiffs have not been…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. LodzinskiSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1937
  2. Travelers Insurance Co. v. LeonardNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1936
  3. Hudson Bus Transportation Co. v. Board of Public Utility CommissionersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
  4. Owen v. City of Atlantic CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1940
  5. Sipley v. WassSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1885

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Catalano v. Pemberton Tp. Bd. of AdjustmentNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1960
  2. Home Builders League of South Jersey, Inc. v. Township of EveshamNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1980
  3. King County v. FarrCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. Wolf v. ShrewsburyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  5. MASNICK v. Mayor & Council of Cedar GroveNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API