Legal Opinion
Catalano v. Pemberton Tp. Bd. of Adjustment
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided February 24, 1960PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
60 N.J. Super. 82 (1960)
158 A.2d 403
SAMUEL CATALANO, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PEMBERTON TOWNSHIP BOARD OF ADJUSTMENT, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-APPELLANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 13, 1959.
Decided February 24, 1960.
Before Judges PRICE, SULLIVAN and FOLEY.
Mr. Martin L. Haines argued the cause for defendants-appellants (Mr. James Logan, Jr., attorney).
Mr. Salvatore J. Avena argued the cause for plaintiff-respondent.
The opinion of the court was delivered by PRICE, S.J.A.D.
By its appeal the Township of Pemberton seeks to reverse a judgment, entered in favor of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- VF Zahodiakin Engineering Corp. v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT, CITY OF SUMMITSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1952
- Thornton v. Village of RidgewoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- McKenna v. New Jersey Highway AuthoritySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- State v. TaylorNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
- Marini v. Borough of WanaqueNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Brunetti v. Borough of New MilfordSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Houman v. Mayor & Coun. Bor. Pompton LakesNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Willoughby v. Planning BoardNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1997
- Edgewater Park v. Edgewater Park Housing Auth.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1982
- Pennington County v. MooreSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.