Legal Opinion

Cioni, Matthew v. Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.

District Court, W.D. Wisconsin

Decided October 20, 2023No. 3:23-cv-00302Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MATTHEW J. CIONI, Plaintiff, v. OPINION and ORDER SAMSUNG CELL PHONE COMPANY and CARRIER 23-cv-302-jdp T-MOBILE, Defendants. Pro se plaintiff Matthew J. Cioni has filed an amended complaint alleging that his father’s Samsung cellphone caught fire while it was charging, which killed Cioni’s father as he slept. Cioni alleges that his father purchased the cellphone from defendant Carrier T-Mobile. Cioni has three strikes under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g), but he has paid the full filing fee. Nevertheless, because Cioni is…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Arnett v. WebsterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
  4. Paul v. SkempWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  5. Hoida, Inc. v. M & I MIDSTATE BANKWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API