Legal Opinion
Fluck v. Blevins
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided April 18, 1997No. Civil 95-391-ASPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ASHMANSKAS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This is a complex action that includes claims for inter alia, violation of securities laws, breach of contract, and RICO. The instant motion (# 207) concerns a settlement between plaintiffs and some of the defendants. A condition of the settlement is that the court enter a “bar order” to protect the settling defendants against contribution claims by non-settling defendants. I previously granted such an order for one group of defendants, though it was a much smaller settlement on that occasion (only about $40,-000.). The Tallman defendants, who…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Agency Holding Corp. v. Malley-Duff & Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Texas Industries, Inc. v. Radcliff Materials, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers UnionSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- McDermott, Inc. v. AmClydeSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Miller v. HolzmannDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Palmer v. University Medical GroupDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1998
- Maner v. Dignity HealthDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2018
- Puget Sound Energy v. Certain Underwriters at Lloyd's, LondonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2006
- Tittle v. Enron Corp.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2005
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.