Gilbert v. Ashley
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtMussell, J.
Plaintiffs have appealed from a judgment rendered against them in an action to enjoin the city clerk, the chief of police and the city council of the city of Escondido from enforcing a business license ordinance, known as ordinance No. 409. Plaintiffs contend that this ordinance is void because it is substantially a reenactment of a previously enacted ordinance, No. 385, which was defeated by the voters of the city at a referendum election.
Ordinance No. 385 was adopted and passed by the city council on June 25, 1947, and by its terms was made effective on and after August 1st, of that year. A…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hunt v. Mayor & Council of RiversideCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
- In Re SumidaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1918
- Ex Parte GoodrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
- In Re StrathamCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1920
- In Re PorterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
3Cited by13 opinions
- Assembly v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Geiger v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
- Martin v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
- Reagan v. City of SausalitoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
- Bird v. Town of Old Orchard BeachSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1981
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.