Legal Opinion
State v. Stephens
New Mexico Court of Appeals
Decided February 12, 1991No. 12328PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HARTZ, Judge.
The district court, in a non-jury trial, found defendant guilty of using a telephone to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend. NMSA 1978, § 30-20-12 (Repl.Pamp.1984). We reverse because the evidence of guilt was insufficient.
I. FACTS
We view the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, resolving all conflicts and indulging all permissible inferences in favor of the verdict. See State v. Sutphin, 107 N.M. 126, 753 P.2d 1314 (1988).
On the morning of March 22, 1989, defendant called Mrs. Gloria Trujillo at work. The receptionist told defendant that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- State v. SutphinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1988
- People v. KlickIllinois Supreme Court · 1977
- People v. SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1977
- State v. GattisNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1986
- Walker v. DillardCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1996
- Jones v. SchoellkopfNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2005
- Rutherford v. City of AlbuquerqueNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1992
- State v. Shaneace L.New Mexico Court of Appeals · 2000
- State v. LongNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 2019
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.