Legal Opinion

People v. Klick

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1977No. 48332-33 consPublishedCited by 50 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Defendants, Rita Klick and Stanley Rudzinski, were charged in separate complaints with disorderly conduct in that they knowingly made a telephone call or calls with the intent to annoy another in violation of section 26 — 1(a)(2) of the Criminal Code of 1961 (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 38, pair. 26 — 1(a)(2)). The circuit court of Cook County granted defendants’ motions to dismiss on the grounds that section 26 — 1(a)(2) is unconstitutional. The State has appealed pursuant to Rule 302(a)(1) (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1973, ch. 110A, par. 302(a)(1)), and the cases have been consolidated for the purpose…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Chaplinsky v. New HampshireSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  4. Cohen v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  5. Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by50 opinions

  1. People v. ShackNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Galloway v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2001
  3. People Ex Rel. Difanis v. BarrIllinois Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Mary Gormley v. Director, Connecticut State Department of Probation and Attorney General of the State of ConnecticutCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
  5. State v. KipfNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API