Michaelson v. City of Portland
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtArmstrong, P. J.
*250In this land use case, petitioners seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order affirming the City of Portland's decision to grant design review approval and a master plan amendment for a seven-story, mixed-use building proposed by intervenor (we refer to the city and intervenor, collectively, as respondents). On review, petitioners raise three assignments of error, challenging the city's interpretation and application of "better meets" in Portland City Code (PCC) 33.825.040 and of a master plan design guideline to the proposed project. As explained below, because we conclude that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Younger v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- Siporen v. City of MedfordOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- Gunderson, LLC v. City of PortlandOregon Supreme Court · 2012
- Mark Latham Excavation, Inc. v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Alliance for Responsible Land Use v. Deschutes CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1997
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Sachdev v. Oregon Medical BoardCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
- Restore Oregon v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020