Legal Opinion
Roginsky v. County of Suffolk, NY
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided August 5, 2010No. Civil Action 09-1160(DRH)(ARL)PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM & ORDER
HURLEY, Senior District Judge:
Plaintiff Dr. Martin Roginsky (“Plaintiff’) commenced this action alleging employment discrimination based upon age in violation of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. and the New York State Executive Law ¶ 296 et seq. Presently before the Court is the motion of defendant County of Suffolk (“Suffolk”) to dismiss the complaint. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is denied.
Background
The following facts are taken from the complaint.
Plaintiff is a physician duly licensed to practice medicine in the…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Community for Creative Non-Violence v. ReidSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Fagan v. U.S. Carpet Installation, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2011
- Bohnet v. Valley Stream Union Free School District 13District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Buchanan v. Performance Management Group LLCDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2025
- Jo Alloway, et al. v. Bowlero Corp., et al.District Court, E.D. New York · 2025