Legal Opinion

Ruppe v. City of Los Angeles

California Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1921No. L. A. No. 6110PublishedCited by 26 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court. W. B. Mathews, Charles S. Burnell, City Attorney, Trent G-. Anderson, Ray C. Eberhard and Lewis E. Whitehead for Appellants.

1Opinion of the CourtOlney, J.

The defendants may be considered as one for the purposes of discussion, and that one the city of Los Angeles. From a judgment against it for five hundred dollars, had after a trial without a jury, the city appeals.

The complaint alleges and the court finds that the defendant was engaged in the business of supplying electric energy for light and power to its inhabitants, and had in its employ as a meter-setter one Nealon; that Nealon, with certain fellow-employees of the city, was sent by it to wire a certain building and set meters therein so that electric energy might be furnished by the city…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Otis Elevator Co. v. First Nat'l Bank of S.F.California Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Rahmel v. LehndorffCalifornia Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Johnson v. MonsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Carr v. Wm. C. Crowell Co.California Supreme Court · 1946
  2. City of Miami v. SimpsonSupreme Court of Florida · 1965
  3. Fields v. SandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Clark Equipment Co. v. WheatCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  5. Alhino v. StarrCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API