Legal Opinion

City of Miami v. Simpson

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided February 17, 1965No. 33036PublishedCited by 79 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

172 So.2d 435 (1965)

CITY OF MIAMI, Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Roce SIMPSON, also known as Roe Simpson, Respondent.

No. 33036.

Supreme Court of Florida.

February 17, 1965.

Rehearing Denied March 29, 1965.

John R. Barrett, City Atty., and John S. Lloyd, Asst. City Atty., for petitioner.

Rosenhouse & Rosenhouse, Nichols, Gaither, Beckham, Colson & Spence, and Alan R. Schwartz, Miami, for respondent.

Joseph A. Wanick, Miami Beach, William S. Frates, Miami, Ralph A. Marsicano, Tampa, Albert L. Weintraub and A. Jay Cristol, Miami, as amicus curiae.

THORNAL, Justice.

By a petition for certiorari we are requested…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Great Northern Railway Co. v. Sunburst Oil & Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
  2. Hargrove v. Town of Cocoa BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  3. Susco Car Rental System of Florida v. LeonardSupreme Court of Florida · 1959
  4. McAndrew v. MularchukSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  5. Sherbutte v. City of Marine CityMichigan Supreme Court · 1964

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by79 opinions

  1. Genty v. Resolution Trust Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
  2. Modlin v. City of Miami BeachSupreme Court of Florida · 1967
  3. Wade v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. Cauley v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of Florida · 1981
  5. Fisher v. City of MiamiSupreme Court of Florida · 1965

74 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API