Legal Opinion

Burkus v. Henshall

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 12, 1956No. Appeals, 160PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Arnold,

On January 1, 1952, Frank Burkus, Jr. and Edgar D. Hagerty, both duly licensed undertakers, entered into a written agreement providing for the establishment of a partnership business as undertakers under the name of Hagerty-Burkus Funeral Home.

By the agreement, the partnership was to continue indefinitely until dissolved. It provided, however, that upon the death of Edgar D. Hagerty the partnership would not be deemed to be dissolved, but that the wife of siich deceased partner (Nell Hagerty) would con tinne therein according to the terms thereof; that upon the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Monaca Borough v. Monaca Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
  2. Quarture v. C. P. Mayer Brick Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1949
  3. Craven EstateSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Aiea Lani Corp. v. Hawaii Escrow & Title Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Litman v. Peoples Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  3. Kasemer v. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. (1996), Maryland Attorney General Reports1996
  5. Camden v. Bucknell UniversityDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API