Legal Opinion

Tummino v. Von Eschenbach Ex Rel. Food & Drug Administration

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided February 24, 2006No. CV 05-366 ERK/VVPPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

POHORELSKY, United States Magistrate Judge.

The plaintiffs in this action seek judicial review, under the Administrative Procedure Act (“APA”), see 5 U.S.C. § 706, and the United States Constitution, of the actions taken by the Food and Drug Administration (the “FDA”) with respect to certain applications requesting the approval of over-the-counter access for Plan B, an emergency contraceptive drug commonly known as the “morning-after pill.” The plaintiffs are a group of individuals, all of whom are women, and organizations involved in the areas of reproductive health and…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. New York v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
  2. Tafas v. DudasDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2008
  3. Joint Venture of Comint Systems Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
  4. Inforeliance Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. State v. U.S. Dep't of CommerceDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 2018

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API