Friedman v. Schoengen
Appellate Court of Illinois
Sub-contractor’s Lien.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Oliver H. Horton, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the March term, 1895.
1Opinion of the Court
Mr. Presiding Justice Waterman
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This was a petition by appellees, sub-contractors, to be allowed a mechanic’s lien.
The petition was answered by appellants, denying many of the material allegations of the petition and setting up new matter as a defense thereto.
According to the abstract the cause was referred to a master “to take proofs and report conclusions.” This would probably be construed to mean to report his conclusions as to the law and evidence—a useful and proper order.
Upon such an order the master does not report the “ proofs ” presented to him; and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Dean v. EmersonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Huling v. FarwellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1889
- Brown v. McKayAppellate Court of Illinois · 1893
- Chapin v. MatsonAppellate Court of Illinois · 1890
- Hodson v. Eugene Glass Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1894
3Cited by6 opinions
- Minchrod v. UllmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Bartholomae & Roesing Brewing & Malting Co. v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
- Hudek v. EnnesserAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
- Jamieson v. WallaceAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
- Ricardi Apartment House Co. v. BeaudetAppellate Court of Illinois · 1896
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.