Legal Opinion

Hudek v. Ennesser

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 30, 1896PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Bill, to foreclose trust deed. Error to the Circuit Court for the County of Cook; the Hon. Elbridq-e Hanecy, Judge, presiding. Heard in this court at the October term, 1896.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Gary

delivebed the opinion of the Court.

The firm of Hallman & Ennesser were furniture manufacturers, and had a plant valued at about $30,000.

They owed a good deal of money, and needed more. Among their indebtedness was $9,000 to Margaret Ennesser, one of the defendants in error, who is the mother of Anton J. Ennesser, the Ennesser of the firm. He was intrusted by his mother with the conduct of all her pecuniary affairs.

Clemens F. Hallman, the other member of the firm, applied to the plaintiff in error, who is a cousin of his wife, for money, and she lent the firm $3,100. To secure the payment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Friedman v. SchoengenAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  2. Foster v. SwabackAppellate Court of Illinois · 1895
  3. Whitcomb v. DuellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894
  4. Green v. HedenbergAppellate Court of Illinois · 1894

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bartholomae & Roesing Brewing & Malting Co. v. SchroederAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  2. Shipman v. MoseleyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API