Legal Opinion
Harris v. Commissioner of Correction
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 8, 2011No. AC 30989PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*454 Opinion
2Per curiam
The petitioner, Leroy Harris, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court, Nazzaro, J., denying his fourth petition for a writ of habeas corpus. The petitioner claims that the habeas court improperly concluded that his trial and first and second habeas counsel provided effective assistance. We reject the petitioner’s claim and affirm the judgment of the habeas court.
The procedural history and facts underlying the petitioner’s conviction and prior habeas petitions were set out at length in Harris v. Commissioner of Correction, 108 Conn. App. 201, 203-204, 947 A.2d 435, cert. denied,…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Lozada v. Warden, State PrisonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 1996
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by8 opinions
- Boyd v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2011
- Lapointe v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Maldonado v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- Martin v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- Harris v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.