Legal Opinion

Lapointe v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided October 9, 2012No. AC 33452PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALVORD, J.

The petitioner, Richard Lapointe, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his second amended petition for a second writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, the petitioner claims that the court improperly rejected his actual innocence and ineffective assistance of counsel claims. We conclude that the court properly determined that the petitioner failed to prove his actual innocence claim, but we agree with the petitioner that the state’s suppression of certain material evidence deprived him of a fair trial and that he was prejudiced by his prior habeas counsel’s failure…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. Miller v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
  4. State v. LapointeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1996
  5. State v. OrtizSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Alterisi v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  2. Davis v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2013
  3. Lapointe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  4. Lapointe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015
  5. Lapointe v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2015

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API