Legal Opinion

Martin v. Commissioner of Correction

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 13, 2018No. AC39202PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtAlvord, J.

The petitioner, Carlton Martin, appeals from the judgment of the habeas court denying his petition for a writ of habeas corpus. On appeal, he claims that the court erred in: (1) rejecting his claim that his due process right to a fair trial under the state and federal constitutions was violated by the introduction of testimony from an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) at his underlying criminal trial, which was later determined to be scientifically invalid; and (2) concluding that his habeas counsel did not render ineffective assistance of counsel. We affirm the judgment of…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Giglio v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Napue v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Martin v. Comm'r of Corr.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API