Legal Opinion
Martin v. Barth
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 16, 1928No. Nos. 3955, 3956PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
EVAN A. EVANS, Circuit Judge.
Both appeals here considered grow out of the same suit, which was instituted by Martin against Oscar, Ernest, Hugh, August, and Alma Barth, and Julia Crecelius and Amelia Welman, all residents of Indiana, save Ernest, who resided in Pennsylvania. Defendants are the heirs at law of Elizabeth Barth, deceased. Plaintiff is a resident of Kentucky.
Many of the facts necessary to a consideration of this appeal are stated in Crecelius v. New Albany Machine Co., 4 F.(2d) 369, an opinion by this court, where the suit of plaintiff’s predecessor was dismissed for want of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Russell v. FarleySupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Northwestern Fuel Co. v. BrockSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Mississippi Valley Fuel Co. v. Watson Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1912
- Baker & Bennett Co. v. N. D. Cass Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1915
- Crecelius v. New Albany Mach. Mfg. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1924
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- United Motors Service, Inc. v. Tropic-Aire, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1932
- Williams v. RickardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928