Legal Opinion

Crecelius v. New Albany Mach. Mfg. Co.

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided December 18, 1924No. 3336PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PAGE, Circuit Judge.

This appeal is to reverse a decree of the United States District Court of Indiana, enjoining appellants, here called defendants, from removing railway tracks, etc., belonging to the Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Company, here called railway company, constructed and operated upon property in which appellee, here called plaintiff, claimed and was decreed to have an easement. Instruments, relating to the alleged easement, which for brevity will be called A and B, are hereinafter set out.

The , original defendant, Elizabeth Barth, now deceased, the grantee…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Barney v. Baltimore CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Chandler v. WardIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ellis B. Grady, Jr., Administrator, C.T.A., of Margarette W. Rodgers, Deceased v. Richard Eugene IrvineCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1958
  2. Trombino v. Transit Casualty Co.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 1986
  3. Long, Admr. v. HortonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1956
  4. Martin v. BarthCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928
  5. Williams v. RickardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API