Legal Opinion

Atlee Credit Corporation v. Quetulio

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided July 23, 1974No. 1 CA-CIV 2318PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

Is a mortgage foreclosure action barred when the statute of limitations has run on the underlying obligation ? That is the question presented on this appeal. In other words, must a mortgage foreclosure action be commenced within the time prescribed by A.R.S. § 12-548:

“An action for debt where indebtedness is evidenced by or founded upon a contract in writing executed within the state shall be commenced and prosecuted within six years after the cause of action accrues, and not afterward.”

Briefly, the chronology of events is as follows. In September, 1963, appellees…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Munger v. BoardmanArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Bracklein v. Realty Ins. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Dickerson v. MacK Financial CorporationCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  4. Griffith v. HumbleNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Lackey v. MelcherSupreme Court of Iowa · 1938

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hansen v. StollCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  2. Dunlap v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
  3. Association of Owners, Satellite Apt., Inc. v. OtteColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
  4. De Anza Land and Leisure Corp. v. RaineriCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1983
  5. McDowell v. United StatesColorado Court of Appeals · 1994

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API