Legal Opinion

Vandoros v. Kovacevic

Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York

Decided February 28, 1974PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Order affirmed, without costs.

Defendants appeal from an order granting summary judgment for plaintiffs dismissing defendants’ counterclaim, based upon a prior order of preclusion.

There appear to be different rules in the various departments as to whether a preclusion order, standing alone, warrants summary judgment. In the First Department, it has been held that summary judgment is not available based solely on a preclusion order (Israel v. Drei Corp., 5 AD 2d 987; cf. Fales v. Witkowski, 36 A D 2d 516). However, in a recent case, Jawitz v. British Leyland Motor Inc. (42 A D 2d…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gelman v. Ford Motor Co.New York Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Israel v. Drei Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Northway Eng'g v. FELIX INDUSNew York Court of Appeals · 1991
  2. Northway Engineering, Inc. v. Felix Industries, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Theocharidis v. Weber Stores, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Magnus Drugs, Inc. v. City of New York Human Resources AdministrationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Mendez v. Queens Plumbing Supply, Inc.New York Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API