Legal Opinion

Gelman v. Ford Motor Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1967PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtVincent D. Damiani, J.

In an action sounding in negligence, breach of warranty, libel and slander, defendant Shell Oil Company (hereafter called defendant) moves for summary judgment. Plaintiff, not an attorney, appearing pro se, cross-moves to strike defendant’s answer on the ground that defendant failed to con*210tinue its examination before trial by the plaintiff, and further cross-moves for an order vacating his default in the service of a bill of particulars in compliance with an order to preclude. The cross motions will be discussed first. [Matter has here been deleted by the editor because not of general…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In Re the Claim of MortonNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
  2. Herman v. . City of BuffaloNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
  3. Brown v. ReedNew York Supreme Court · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Vandoros v. KovacevicAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1974
  2. Abreu v. Getty Refining & Marketing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API