Legal Opinion
Chavez v. Converse, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided March 13, 2020No. 5:15-cv-03746Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 ERIC CHAVEZ, Case No. 15-cv-03746-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART 12 AND DENYING IN PART v. DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR 13 SUMMARY JUDGMENT CONVERSE, INC., 14 Re: Dkt. No. 179 Defendant. 15 16 17 Plaintiff Eric Chavez represents a class of employees, arguing that Defendant 18 Converse, Inc. owes wages for time spent by the class undergoing mandatory security 19 inspections. Moving for summary judgment, Converse argues that its policy was 20 implemented under a good faith understanding of California law and…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Troester v. Starbucks CorporationCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
- 66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 290, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,347 Susan A. Bator v. State of Hawaii, and Carolyn M. Kainuma, in Her Individual Capacity Warren T. Asaeda, in His Individual CapacityCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
- Gomez v. Lincare, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009
- Magadia v. Wal-Mart Assocs., Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.